Sunday, August 26, 2007

Fish Bowl & Cigarettes: Teil Eins


This was the first enthusiastic spurt of jigsawed ideas that befell me after receiving this project. Cigarette smoke has to be the most intriguing and beautiful part of a cigarette. Produced from this small glowing tip into wisps of shadow… yes, I know it’s already been used in countless films as an artistic device: the curve and grace of it for femininity, the harsh reality of its production for masculinity.

But there’s more to it than that. It’s motion. It’s fluid mechanics. It’s a scientific device; it’s one of the few things that allow us to visualize air currents. We can see the lift that allows us to fly; we can see the backflows that da Vinci studied, which in blood closes ventricular valves. So sure, those are applications, but when I think of cigarettes, I think of the curl of smoke, and that’s caused by those same physical principles.

So a fish bowl? A container. Smoke, a fluid. Contain the smoke? I don’t know. An image of a fish bowl above a cigarette comes to mind, collecting the smoke as it nonchalantly burns low. And something clicks – this whole motion idea. The difference between motion and movement may be merely semantics, but something is there. Motion seems like movement without intention; an object can have motion, but a person creates movement. Automation. The smoke moves automatically because the factors affecting it move it. It happens as a direct result of the inputs, even if there are thousands of them: heat rising, pressures equalizing, butterfly pooping. And like every bad habit, like smoking, I’ve return to my past way of thinking about things, returned to the discussion of the last post.

For me, smoking is absolutely tied to a parentally decided ‘bad.’ “Talk to your kids about not smoking,” “Every cigarette takes three minutes off your life” and “Your dad quit smoking when he got married.” And a fish bowl – how could I escape the image of the reprimanding but futily enforcing goldfish from Dr. Seuss’s Cat in the Hat? I’ll have to read that story again, and figure out why and how he fits in.

Back to the tangible ideas. I don’t want the cigarette to just burn, I want it to move underneath, too. I want to put it on a record player! Yeah, I’ll go to the thrift store and get one. Oh, and records, too, and fish bowls. And maybe a fish bowl on the record player, with water so that the water centrifuges outward (see sketches above). Nick Zammuto of the Books created some great rhythmic pieces with spirograph-type scratching on the inner part of records and digitally reordering them. I want to do that. Wait, automated music. Music caused by the motion and factors. Sweet, something is tying this all together. But why a record player, why was that so immediate? And halfway through checking out in a Christian-based thrift store, this comes to me:

Two starting points
should define
a line
Like orange ember tip to black eye bead
and infinite means between
but no means to an end
because they are two starting
too startling
points.
Who says the shortest distance
is the path of least resistance?
Like the swirl of smoke from filter to ceiling
the eddy of scales that enables breathing
to start
two starting
here’s to starting
Over.

Tuesday, August 21, 2007

Fish Bowl & Cigarettes: Prologue

My assignment; the mere name of two objects tethered by an ampersand. Like any post-modernist seems willing to do, I could just discard the two ideas and invent any number of creative self-fulfilling projects for myself, claiming that the discarding creates an infinitely possible canvas more valuable than the original assignment itself thus fulfilling the assignment. Creation through destruction, freedom through disobedience.

No, it’s not in my constitution, my training. I’m too curiosity-riddled, too eager to pick up an object when given it and turn it over in my hands, navigating the boundaries with the ridges of my finger.

The problem with an infinitely possible canvas is that you may never start. You may stare blankly at a grocery store wall of Crest toothpastes in every possible combination of whitening, tartar control, cavity protection, breath-freshening, gingivitis-fighting, flavor and color only to realize that there is an entire shelf next to it filled with the same combinations for Colgate. And then again, there is another store chain with the same two shelves next to each, but maybe they have more combinations and different brands. You may think you could quit school and buy a house in Alaska with whomever you’re madly in love with at the moment and brush your teeth five times a day. But you don’t. You stay in school and buy the same toothpaste you did last time from that store you always go to. Or maybe you did switch, because of some commercial or recommendation from a friend or because you read this and would really like to prove me wrong.

Well, I’ll tell you right now I’m not right. But down to the itty-bitty nitty-gritty widdle-kitty of the question: there IS an infinitely possible canvas in front of us, we could choose, insofar as we believe to have choice, from any number of actions at this exact point in time. So what is stopping us?

It’s too big for me. So much choice and possibility is overwhelming. In the movie Adaptation, Meryl Streep’s character says, “There are too many ideas and things and people – too many directions to go. I was starting to believe the reason it matters to care passionately about something is that it whittles the world down to a more manageable size.” I don’t know much about passion, but it certainly is a filter that allows you to look at a small slice of infinity, narrows your vision. Humans just can’t conceive infinity, we can’t even wrap our minds around it. We use every grand metaphor in our lingual arsenal to describe it, and even then we are only very narrowly moving toward comprehension. I find myself choosing and reaching out when I have input, when I have reason to change. Choices trace back to reasons, which when compiled in the most complete state, form a truss of circumstances and cause-effect reactions that build the road in the direction we see, a la butterfly effect. Of course, the factors that lead us to what we know as decisions are near if not infinite themselves, and thus conceiving our choices as the formulaic direct output of a bajillion-zillion paper-maché wing flaps is impossible by the sheer elusively ominous presence of infinity.

I know somehow that I function as a function, if you will, on an input-output basis, although that function evolves as any number of other outputs affects it. And who’s to say how many inputs there are. See, the sheer idea of infinity again gouges this metaphor from the inside out. So I guess all I’ve really gotten at this time is the art-i-choke heart of this Peer Pressure Project. I’ve asked someone to give me an input in the form of an assignment of any sort. Based on the output, can I perhaps translucently gaze back at the factors that caused me to get from assignment to product, input to output, A to B? Figure out my ingrained cause-effects system, like a transfer function? Maybe if I document it along the way. Step-by-step iterations. Hence this and subsequent posts, though I don’t mean to blog. And like I said, I will be starting with fish bowl & cigarettes.

(Chris)

Saturday, August 4, 2007

Projectz

Yo yo yo this be the stevie may up in here. Project Peer Pressure is under way!!! I'm hella stoked and I hope y'all are, too. PPP consists of:
Becky O'Connnnellllll, Kyle O'Connnorrrrrr, Whitney Whubbard, Chrisnoelton, Nathan Hmmmmming, Dance Commander Daniel Forager, Our Lord and Saviour John Clarkie, and this other dude who may or may not have an identical identity to mine.

it works like this: each person assigns an assignment to their assignee and in turn receives one. then we make art, and eventually we show it yeah! the order is something like this:

ASSIGNER | ASSIGNEE
------------------------------
WHITNEY | JOHN
|
JOHN | NATHAN
|
NATHAN | CHRIS
|
CHRIS | STEVE
|
STEVE | DANIEL
|
DANIEL | KYLE
|
KYLE | BECKY
|
BECKY | WHITNEY

DIG? I do!




AND THEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!




PROJECT SNUGGLES!!!!

this won't be the title of the piece as performed, but until i get one, that's what i'm using. soooooooooooooo here's what i posted in YOUR space


whoa, can't do it by myself:

I AM LOOKING FOR A FEW PERFORMERS FOR A PROJECT I'M WORKING ON, TENTATIVELY TITLED "PROJECT SNUGGLES." PROBABLY THERE WILL BE SINGING, DANCING/MOVING, PARTIAL OR MORE NUDITY/MAKIN' OUT, AND DEFINITELY SNUGGLING IN BED. LET ME KNOW IF YOU ARE INTERESTED. THANKS,
THE MANAGEMENT


also to be known:
this will take place probably first in urbana/champaign, as that is where i will be, but once developed, will be able to be performed elsewhere, so for beginning stages you'll need to be in urbana often enough, but still let me know if you're interested if you're not, because hopefully this will carry on post my college education.

and then let's see...probably i can't pay you but i can treat you real nice and sometimes feed you, and then if performances work well enough, we might be able to have a legit, charge a few bucks at the door type thing go on, and i'd split that equal ways.

and maybe the last thing for now:
i'm not sure how many folks to use, but ideally different combinations of b's and g's would be swell. if you and your gf/bf would both be down that might be ideal, since you probably do all this snuggly business already.

ok love you all,

steph[en][anie]



that ends on a nice note, so i'll leave it, but I AM STILL LOOKING FOR PERFORMERS YAY!!!! so if you wanna...

PEACE!!!!!!!!1